Mark Roland

September 20th, 2008 filed in Cycling

Mark Roland

Mark Roland, an Australian cyclist, has been suspended for two years for using human growth hormone by the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority. Investigators for the ASADA found that Roland used HGH twice in 2003, and he was also found to have used the anabolic steroid dehydroepiandrosterone (easy for us to say) three times during 2003 and 2004. This is a significant suspension as it relied solely on evidence obtained by investigators rather than a positive test.

The West Australian published this quote from ASADA Chairman Richard Ings :

“This sanction clearly illustrates that athletes do not need to return a positive test to be found to have violated anti-doping rules. In this case, ASADA investigators, working in partnership with other government agencies, identified and prosecuted a serious doping violation that could not have been detected through normal testing procedures.”

Roland, who competed professionally with the 2003 Giant Asia Racing Team won a criterium of the 2003 Southbank Grand-Prix Cycling Classic on December 7th, 2003. As a result of the investigation, the 30-year-old Roland will forfeit all competition results from his first use of HGH in 2003 until 2008, and will be eligible to return to the sport in 2010.

Share :
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Mixx
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Propeller
  • Fark
  • Google



2 Responses to “Mark Roland”

  1. 1
    Billy_Beater Says:

    The guy gets banned for two years and he didn’t even test positive? That seems a bit scary to me. Now the Doping Agencies are the investigators, prosecutor, judge and jury all in one. How are we to know that their proof is indisputable and they aren’t just out to pick off some low hanging fruit in the name or diligence? Nothing in the unremarkable career of Mark Roland would suggest that he has done anything illegal.

  2. 2
    Peter S Says:

    I completely agree with you billy. The idea that there was no actually positive drug test and this was only the subject of their “own” investigations is ridiculous. I have also heard they did not even check whether scripts were even filled. Furthermore, in most cases does the ban not start when they first suspect him of taking the drug as opposed to now?

Leave a Reply